Davy: providers should pay lion's share of FSCS fees Davy: providers should pay lion's share of FSCS fees

05 Apr 2017 Ken Davy

Product providers should contribute most of the running costs of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, Ken Davy has said.

The chairman of SimplyBiz, replying to the consultation on the FSCS’s future funding on behalf of the company, said he agreed with some of the proposals on the proviso that product providers contributed more.

He said: “We have consistently argued for many years that product providers benefit from what is essentially, the risk free distribution of their products.

“We believe, that to properly recognise the long-term, significant financial benefits, providers gain from the distribution of their products through intermediaries they must contribute the major portion of the FSCS funding costs, and not less than 75 per cent.”

In a consultation on the funding of the FSCS, the Financial Conduct Authority recommended reducing the number of funding classes to reduce the levy’s volatility.

The FCA is also considering including contributions from product providers towards the first pound in any claim.

But providers themselves have criticised this move strongly, with the Association of British Insurers saying its members had little direct influence over failures by advisers and there was "no justification" for the change.

Addressing the FCA’s proposal to reduce the number of funding classes, Mr Davy expressed scepticism.

He said: “Reducing the number of funding classes would not, of itself, address the fundamental issue of how the scheme is funded.

“By its nature, when making future predictions, there will be unforeseen circumstances and it is the excessive cost of the overall funding which creates financial insecurity for firms, rather than volatility.”

But he said there was merit to the idea of amalgamating the investment intermediation and life and pension intermediation classes since the differences for the consumer are “meaningless”.

Mr Davy was also sceptical about the FCA’s proposals to introduce comprehensive, mandatory professional indemnity insurance since it could cause underwriters to leave the market.


Testimonials

Thank you so much for your help with becoming directly authorised – it’s been so much easier than I thought. 

You have all been so helpful and professional and I am still quite stunned by the support from SimplyBiz. Whenever I ring up, the response is always more thorough than I would have expected. 

I really am very, very pleased I joined - here’s to a bright new future.

Alison Treharne
Shore Financial Planning

Read More

Latest News

The new HMRC Trust Registration Service - what advisers need to know

June 16, 2017

The new HMRC Trust Registration Service - what advisers need to know

Read more >

"Treat all those you care for with love while you can"

June 15, 2017

As this is my first column for about seven weeks it will be a very personal one and I would like to start by thanking the many hundreds of financial advisers and others in our great profession who have sent messages of condolence and support to me on the sudden loss of my beloved wife, Jennifer. 

Read more >

Keeley Paddon: Considerations for a positive DB transfer recommendation - Part 2

June 08, 2017

Read more >

NMBA - How Govt's apprentice funding freeze risks the future of advice

June 06, 2017

Existing training providers have seen their funding slashed while advice firms have to wait longer to register their employees for apprenticeship schemes.

Read more >