FCA implements SMR principles to govern all firms FCA implements SMR principles to govern all firms

09 Feb 2017 Ken Davy

The traditional saying: 'What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander' has held true since the 17th Century, so it is very encouraging to see that when it comes to the application of the Senior Managers Regime (SMR), the Financial Conduct Authority is voluntarily adopting its principles for itself.

The FCA is already applying the SMR to major financial institutions, and anticipates extending them to smaller firms, including IFAs, in 2018. The logic of the rules is irrefutable. Indeed, given the scale of the consumer detriment the big battalions, such as banks, have created over the years, it is quite amazing that such a regime has not been brought in much earlier.

The SMR places the responsibility for mismanagement, and poor or sharp business practices, squarely on the heads of the senior managers of the business. This means the FCA can hold an individual director, or a group of directors or senior managers, personally responsible for the actions of the business.

Penalties for individuals who fail to take reasonable steps to properly discharge their responsibilities are likely be very severe.
Having dealt with IFA firms for more than 40 years, I know the vast majority of advisers work hard and responsibly to do the best for their clients. As a result, I believe that you will have little to fear from the SMR, providing you make sure you follow the basic principle of combining good compliance and common sense with sound business practice.

In last week’s column, I drew attention to a firm whose business practices the FCA was reportedly seriously concerned about. Despite this concern, the firm continued doing business, which it is now feared has caused clients further significant detriment. Given that one would have thought the relevant permissions could have been withdrawn immediately, this appears to be gross mismanagement by the FCA.

Will the FCA now apply the SMR to itself? If this problem could have been nipped in the bud by the FCA and was not – with the result being that clients have suffered financial detriment which IFAs will end up paying for through higher FSCS levies – will the FCA's senior management now be called to account? After all, what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

Ken Davy is chairman of SimplyBiz


Testimonials

"We joined SimplyBiz in 2010, having been members of the Sesame Network in one guise or another for nearly 10 years. We decided to leave the network because we felt that in the latter years we were just a number and it was beginning to feel like being back at school!  I have to say that the SimplyBiz approach is totally refreshing and that we feel in control of our own business again, whilst still having a good robust compliance support provider to guide us. We have since recommended SimplyBiz to other colleagues and would have no hesitation in doing so again."

Grant Kingston
Braintree

Read More

Latest News

Matt Timmins: New guidance body has no right to word 'advice'

October 20, 2017

Much more needs to be done to help educate consumers on the vital difference between receiving guidance or advice

Read more >

Government must help meet the needs of the elderly

October 11, 2017

Being able to congratulate the FCA, while not by any means a first, is not something I am able to do regularly.

Read more >

"A princely way of looking at succession issues"

October 04, 2017

Seeing all the stories about Prince George starting school set me thinking about longevity and business succession issues for financial advisers.

Read more >

"Providers must allow tax deductible advice"

September 28, 2017

Knock, knock. Are you there? More importantly, are you listening?
I ask this question because of the enormous opportunities the current market is presenting for each and every adviser, whether working within a large firm or a one-person practice, as an independent adviser or restricted.

Read more >