"Scottish Widows addresses FSCS funding issue" "Scottish Widows addresses FSCS funding issue"

28 Jun 2017

As regular readers of this column will know, I have campaigned for more than two decades for the regulator to radically change how the FSCS is funded.

I was therefore encouraged to note earlier this year that the FCA strongly indicated it recognised the injustice of the current funding method. With the tide against the unfairness gathering momentum, I am now delighted to see a thoughtful and constructive piece on the future funding of the FSCS from Ronnie Taylor, distribution director of Scottish Widows.

For such a respected provider to acknowledge the injustice of the current funding is an important milestone. I believe all of us involved in the advice sector should be very encouraged to see this unfairness being acknowledged, first by the FCA and now by such a major provider.  

Mr Taylor's article, which you can view in full on Scottish Widows’ website, recognises that providers have a significant part to play in contributing to a solution. They have the ability to identify and avoid market risks and therefore help to ensure that the FSCS funding falls to a greater extent on those providers and firms creating the liabilities.

Product providers, as well as clients, benefit substantially from the existence of a strong, vibrant and successful financial advice sector. This has previously been recognised by many providers who voluntarily contributed to the FSCS levy to ensure the advice sector was not disproportionately penalised.  

It was also clearly acknowledged by the PIA which, within a £100m cap, proposed that approximately 85 per cent should be met by the providers that benefited from the business placed by advisers.

Going forward, it will clearly be important that the core funding of the FSCS involves contributions from providers to ensure their market knowledge is used proactively to reduce the number of calls on the FSCS, combined, where possible, with a higher proportion of costs falling upon those involved in producing or promoting higher risk products.  

Sharing costs across the product providers’ value chain, while also using risk-based levies and improvements in professional indemnity cover to change the funding of the FSCS, has the potential to reduce its overall liabilities while dramatically, and rightly, reducing the costs to financial advisers.

My congratulations go to Scottish Widows and Mr Taylor on such a helpful and constructive contribution to this important debate.  

Ken Davy is chairman of The SimplyBiz Group


Testimonials

"All my other contacts with SimplyBiz have been, without exception, friendly and all my queries have been dealt with efficiently and effectively. I feel reassured to be a member of an organisation which quite clearly has its Members' interests at heart and which has a positive philosophy with both corporate and individual competence."

Dr David Carter APFS
Tiverton

Read More

Latest News

A balanced view

July 20, 2017

Ronnie Taylor of Scottish Widows sets out his views on FSCS funding below, with an introduction from Ken Davy.

Read more >

Liberté! Egalité! Regulatory!

July 19, 2017

With MiFIID II, GDPR and IDD on the horizon, will UK firms be facing a REXIT (regulatory exit) or opening borders to EU legislation? 

Read more >

"Times change, but savings advice is still needed"

July 17, 2017

One of the most notable years for me was 1963. Jennifer and I had just bought our first house for the princely sum of £1,400, which back then seemed an awful lot of money.

Read more >

So FAMR, so good ...

July 11, 2017

12 months since its introduction, what effect is FAMR having on day-to-day business? Can we claim it’s so FAMR, so good?    

Read more >