"PI insurance is no magic wand for FSCS funding" "PI insurance is no magic wand for FSCS funding"

31 Jan 2017 Ken Davy

Sometimes it can be useful to mix metaphors in order to make a point and, in the case of the FCA’s current review of the FSCS funding, I believe it is absolutely essential.

While speculating in the Consultation Paper about the possibility of forcing changes on professional indemnity (PI) insurers may be a genuine attempt to broaden the debate, it is, at best, unhelpful and, at worst, an unnecessary complication that demonstrates a misunderstanding of the way the PI insurance (PII) market works.

On the face of it, the suggestion of enforcing PI insurers to provide broader cover might look attractive

Unfortunately, however, the PII market relies on individual insurers risking their backers’ hard cash by providing cover that delivers a reasonable balance of risk and reward.  The moment you attempt to force the insurers to accept risks they don't wish to cover, they will simply exit the market completely.

On the face of it, the suggestion of enforcing PI insurers to provide broader cover might look attractive.  

Are the memories of the regulators and the Treasury so short as to have forgotten the lessons of 2002/3 when the PII market virtually ceased to function for the IFA sector? The result was that between 2000 and 3000 firms regulated by the FSA were priced out of the market by hikes in premiums of tenfold or more. So dramatic was the withdrawal of PI insurers from the market that, despite it being a legal requirement under the FSA's rules for a firm to carry appropriate PI insurance, the regulator turned a blind eye to firms who were unable to obtain cover.

This logjam was only broken when, in mid-2003, SimplyBiz, through a reinsurance mechanism, offered to underwrite 95 per cent of the PI risk for directly regulated firms. The success of this creative solution was, I am delighted to say, acknowledged by the FSA in a 2003 Consultation Paper.

This ultimately led to the development of a more stable and competitive PII market which, while still not without cost, has served advisers and consumers reasonably well in recent years. It would be a sorry outcome of the FSCS funding review if we create a much fairer funding method only to end up with ridiculously expensive PII costs for advisers. I urge the Treasury and the FCA to keep their focus on restructuring the current system to eliminate its grotesque unfairness to IFAs, rather than chasing red herrings through ever muddier waters.

Ken Davy is chairman of SimplyBiz


Testimonials

“I am delighted with SimplyBiz so far and always tell other IFAs that they should join. It is a well run organisation and excels in most of its endeavours. Ken in my opinion is THE representative for advisers in the RDR”

Ian Couling
Sophex Ltd t/a Lifetime Financial Solutions

Read More

Latest News

GDPR – the dawn of a new era in data security and usage

January 09, 2018

As you are no doubt aware, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was first introduced in April 2016 by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the new regulation must be adopted by every UK firm that handles personal data by the 25th of May 2018.

Read more >

View from the top...

January 09, 2018

With nearly five decades of experience in the financial services sector, SimplyBiz Group Chairman, Ken Davy, provides a unique perspective on the advisory landscape. In this edition of Adviser Today, Ken gives us his view on the FCA’s recent Paper on the ageing population, and why he feels this piece of research is so important. 

Read more >

Davy warns of 'year of regulation'

January 04, 2018

SimplyBiz founder and chairman Ken Davy has warned 2018 will be the year when advisers are hit by more rules and regulations than ever before.

Read more >

A New Year message from Ken Davy

January 03, 2018

SimplyBiz Group Chairman, Ken Davy provides an update on the year ahead, regulation, our services, and his campaign to reform the FSCS funding system. 

Read more >